<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10 Reasons You Know Blogs Are Getting On Your Nerves</title>
	<atom:link href="http://usabilityworks.org/2006/11/22/10-reasons-you-know-blogs-are-getting-on-your-nerves/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://usabilityworks.org/2006/11/22/10-reasons-you-know-blogs-are-getting-on-your-nerves/</link>
	<description>Making next year's Human-Computer family reunion a lot less uncomfortable.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Oliphant</title>
		<link>http://usabilityworks.org/2006/11/22/10-reasons-you-know-blogs-are-getting-on-your-nerves/#comment-4680</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Oliphant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilityworks.org/2006/11/22/10-reasons-you-know-blogs-are-getting-on-your-nerves/#comment-4680</guid>
		<description>The flaw in your logic is that quality is subjective. :)  Other than that I agree with you.  Though I cannot make the claim that my low posting frequency equates a high quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The flaw in your logic is that quality is subjective. :)  Other than that I agree with you.  Though I cannot make the claim that my low posting frequency equates a high quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Szuc</title>
		<link>http://usabilityworks.org/2006/11/22/10-reasons-you-know-blogs-are-getting-on-your-nerves/#comment-4678</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Szuc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilityworks.org/2006/11/22/10-reasons-you-know-blogs-are-getting-on-your-nerves/#comment-4678</guid>
		<description>Suggest there is something to be said for a "blog publishing strategy". 

If one assumes that readers are also following other blogs, their email, sites they randomly visit, newsletters etc wouldn't it be wise to blog less? Or to think about the quality around the blob posting? If bloggers did this more (publish less, more quality), readers would have less to follow and perhaps get more out of the blog postings once published? 

I guess some of this depends on the blog purpose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suggest there is something to be said for a &#8220;blog publishing strategy&#8221;. </p>
<p>If one assumes that readers are also following other blogs, their email, sites they randomly visit, newsletters etc wouldn&#8217;t it be wise to blog less? Or to think about the quality around the blob posting? If bloggers did this more (publish less, more quality), readers would have less to follow and perhaps get more out of the blog postings once published? </p>
<p>I guess some of this depends on the blog purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
