<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Simplicity, Complexity, and Complicatedness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://usabilityworks.org/2006/12/13/simplicity-complexity-and-complicatedness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://usabilityworks.org/2006/12/13/simplicity-complexity-and-complicatedness/</link>
	<description>Making next year's Human-Computer family reunion a lot less uncomfortable.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan Ward</title>
		<link>http://usabilityworks.org/2006/12/13/simplicity-complexity-and-complicatedness/comment-page-1/#comment-50886</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilityworks.org/2006/12/13/simplicity-complexity-and-complicatedness/#comment-50886</guid>
		<description>Great post! You might enjoy my "Simplicity Cycle" book (available as a free download at www.lulu.com/RoguePress), which goes through similar concepts.  I describe the book as a graphical exploration of complexity, goodness and time. It goes into the difference btwn complexity and complication, and has a strong emphasis on purpose, as your post stated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post! You might enjoy my &#8220;Simplicity Cycle&#8221; book (available as a free download at <a href="http://www.lulu.com/RoguePress" rel="nofollow">http://www.lulu.com/RoguePress</a>), which goes through similar concepts.  I describe the book as a graphical exploration of complexity, goodness and time. It goes into the difference btwn complexity and complication, and has a strong emphasis on purpose, as your post stated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesper RÃ¸nn-Jensen</title>
		<link>http://usabilityworks.org/2006/12/13/simplicity-complexity-and-complicatedness/comment-page-1/#comment-6247</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesper RÃ¸nn-Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilityworks.org/2006/12/13/simplicity-complexity-and-complicatedness/#comment-6247</guid>
		<description>By the way, a good example of simpler is better is the new "Import data" feature on Google Finance. I wrote about it in &lt;a href="http://justaddwater.dk/2006/12/15/simplest-import-data-user-interface-ever/" title="Permanent Link to Simplest â€œImport Dataâ€ User Interface Ever" rel="nofollow"&gt;Simplest â€œImport Dataâ€ User Interface Ever&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, a good example of simpler is better is the new &#8220;Import data&#8221; feature on Google Finance. I wrote about it in <a href="http://justaddwater.dk/2006/12/15/simplest-import-data-user-interface-ever/" title="Permanent Link to Simplest â€œImport Dataâ€ User Interface Ever" rel="nofollow">Simplest â€œImport Dataâ€ User Interface Ever</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesper RÃ¸nn-Jensen</title>
		<link>http://usabilityworks.org/2006/12/13/simplicity-complexity-and-complicatedness/comment-page-1/#comment-6125</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesper RÃ¸nn-Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilityworks.org/2006/12/13/simplicity-complexity-and-complicatedness/#comment-6125</guid>
		<description>Matthew,
you might also have seen Baekdals &lt;a href="http://baekdal.com/articles/Usability/make-it-hard-vs-easy/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Making it hard is Sometimes Better&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthew,<br />
you might also have seen Baekdals <a href="http://baekdal.com/articles/Usability/make-it-hard-vs-easy/" rel="nofollow">Making it hard is Sometimes Better</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Kistner</title>
		<link>http://usabilityworks.org/2006/12/13/simplicity-complexity-and-complicatedness/comment-page-1/#comment-5843</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Kistner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilityworks.org/2006/12/13/simplicity-complexity-and-complicatedness/#comment-5843</guid>
		<description>Well said! I think we are building an unnecessary aversion to making complex systems in fear of making things complicated. I think Google is a classic example of something complex presented simply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said! I think we are building an unnecessary aversion to making complex systems in fear of making things complicated. I think Google is a classic example of something complex presented simply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
