<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How To Run A Card Sort and A Little Bit of Why</title>
	<atom:link href="http://usabilityworks.org/2007/06/28/how-to-run-a-card-sort-and-a-little-bit-of-why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://usabilityworks.org/2007/06/28/how-to-run-a-card-sort-and-a-little-bit-of-why/</link>
	<description>Making next year's Human-Computer family reunion a lot less uncomfortable.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: vijaycua</title>
		<link>http://usabilityworks.org/2007/06/28/how-to-run-a-card-sort-and-a-little-bit-of-why/#comment-51222</link>
		<dc:creator>vijaycua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 07:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilityworks.org/2007/06/28/how-to-run-a-card-sort-and-a-little-bit-of-why/#comment-51222</guid>
		<description>great article!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great article!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://usabilityworks.org/2007/06/28/how-to-run-a-card-sort-and-a-little-bit-of-why/#comment-49553</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilityworks.org/2007/06/28/how-to-run-a-card-sort-and-a-little-bit-of-why/#comment-49553</guid>
		<description>Great article! Thought you might be interested in taking a look at the &lt;a href="http://www.rosenfeldmedia.com/books/cardsorting/blog/eurostar_card_sorting_case_stu/" rel="nofollow"&gt;card sorting case study&lt;/a&gt; that Donna Maurer just published on our behalf. It discusses the return on investment we helped Eurostar deliver last year via use of this method.

While its difficult to separate the impact of card sorting from the impact of the other activities that comprised this project, in the year since its redesigned site launched, Eurostar's online revenues grew from &#163;110 million to &#163;136 million (an increase of 24%, or &#163;26 million!).

PS. I'm colour-blind and I find it quite difficult to pick out the embedded links on your site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article! Thought you might be interested in taking a look at the <a href="http://www.rosenfeldmedia.com/books/cardsorting/blog/eurostar_card_sorting_case_stu/" rel="nofollow">card sorting case study</a> that Donna Maurer just published on our behalf. It discusses the return on investment we helped Eurostar deliver last year via use of this method.</p>
<p>While its difficult to separate the impact of card sorting from the impact of the other activities that comprised this project, in the year since its redesigned site launched, Eurostar&#8217;s online revenues grew from &pound;110 million to &pound;136 million (an increase of 24%, or &pound;26 million!).</p>
<p>PS. I&#8217;m colour-blind and I find it quite difficult to pick out the embedded links on your site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Ng</title>
		<link>http://usabilityworks.org/2007/06/28/how-to-run-a-card-sort-and-a-little-bit-of-why/#comment-42506</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Ng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 23:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilityworks.org/2007/06/28/how-to-run-a-card-sort-and-a-little-bit-of-why/#comment-42506</guid>
		<description>Hi Matt,

Like you say, the biggest challenge with any card sort is making sense of the results.  Dendrograms are defacto favourites of course, but it seems that no one REALLY understands how this works.  I've never got any decent results from them compared to the classic "eyeballing" of results (which yields different results depending on who does it and how much sleep they've had..)

Of course, I'm a bit biased.. as we just released an &lt;a href="http://www.optimalsort.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;online card sort tool&lt;/a&gt; that &lt;a href="http://www.optimalsort.com/blog/?p=7" rel="nofollow"&gt;doesn't do dendrograms&lt;/a&gt;.. Of course, I'd like to think I could change your mind about the comment you made here:

&#62;&#62; ...but I find it easier to have people play with index cards over learning how to use a tool just so your data collection life can be easier.

ps. On the subject of physical cards, we've done a whole lot of these both printed on index cards and handwritten on Post-It notes - no observable difference in our opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt,</p>
<p>Like you say, the biggest challenge with any card sort is making sense of the results.  Dendrograms are defacto favourites of course, but it seems that no one REALLY understands how this works.  I&#8217;ve never got any decent results from them compared to the classic &#8220;eyeballing&#8221; of results (which yields different results depending on who does it and how much sleep they&#8217;ve had..)</p>
<p>Of course, I&#8217;m a bit biased.. as we just released an <a href="http://www.optimalsort.com" rel="nofollow">online card sort tool</a> that <a href="http://www.optimalsort.com/blog/?p=7" rel="nofollow">doesn&#8217;t do dendrograms</a>.. Of course, I&#8217;d like to think I could change your mind about the comment you made here:</p>
<p>&gt;&gt; &#8230;but I find it easier to have people play with index cards over learning how to use a tool just so your data collection life can be easier.</p>
<p>ps. On the subject of physical cards, we&#8217;ve done a whole lot of these both printed on index cards and handwritten on Post-It notes - no observable difference in our opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abi Jones</title>
		<link>http://usabilityworks.org/2007/06/28/how-to-run-a-card-sort-and-a-little-bit-of-why/#comment-42480</link>
		<dc:creator>Abi Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilityworks.org/2007/06/28/how-to-run-a-card-sort-and-a-little-bit-of-why/#comment-42480</guid>
		<description>Oh, I print out the cards because I'd rather do that than write out 50-100 cards for the sort.

For the title-conjuring, I give people blanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I print out the cards because I&#8217;d rather do that than write out 50-100 cards for the sort.</p>
<p>For the title-conjuring, I give people blanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Oliphant</title>
		<link>http://usabilityworks.org/2007/06/28/how-to-run-a-card-sort-and-a-little-bit-of-why/#comment-41947</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Oliphant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 14:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilityworks.org/2007/06/28/how-to-run-a-card-sort-and-a-little-bit-of-why/#comment-41947</guid>
		<description>Buenos dias, Abi.  

Do you find when the cards are printed versus handwritten that you get more, less, or no difference in people writing on the cards to change the items?

Much like people comment less on "finished looking" prototypes, I wonder if people would feel like they could change things if needed if the cards were printed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buenos dias, Abi.  </p>
<p>Do you find when the cards are printed versus handwritten that you get more, less, or no difference in people writing on the cards to change the items?</p>
<p>Much like people comment less on &#8220;finished looking&#8221; prototypes, I wonder if people would feel like they could change things if needed if the cards were printed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abi Jones</title>
		<link>http://usabilityworks.org/2007/06/28/how-to-run-a-card-sort-and-a-little-bit-of-why/#comment-41945</link>
		<dc:creator>Abi Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 13:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilityworks.org/2007/06/28/how-to-run-a-card-sort-and-a-little-bit-of-why/#comment-41945</guid>
		<description>Hola Matt! Thanks for writing about card sorts. I hope that they get lots of publicity and that people will not give me weird looks when I say 'Let's do a card sort!'.

I find that it is best to have the cards printed in a sans-serif font. But perhaps that's just me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hola Matt! Thanks for writing about card sorts. I hope that they get lots of publicity and that people will not give me weird looks when I say &#8216;Let&#8217;s do a card sort!&#8217;.</p>
<p>I find that it is best to have the cards printed in a sans-serif font. But perhaps that&#8217;s just me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
