<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monetizing Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://usabilityworks.org/2008/01/15/monetizing-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://usabilityworks.org/2008/01/15/monetizing-twitter/</link>
	<description>Making next year's Human-Computer family reunion a lot less uncomfortable.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://usabilityworks.org/2008/01/15/monetizing-twitter/#comment-51814</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 02:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilityworks.org/2008/01/15/monetizing-twitter/#comment-51814</guid>
		<description>I forgot - Here is the link to an article I read today on the subject:
http://blogcampaigning.com/2008/10/making-money-with-twitter/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot - Here is the link to an article I read today on the subject:<br />
<a href="http://blogcampaigning.com/2008/10/making-money-with-twitter/" rel="nofollow">http://blogcampaigning.com/2008/10/making-money-with-twitter/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://usabilityworks.org/2008/01/15/monetizing-twitter/#comment-51813</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 02:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilityworks.org/2008/01/15/monetizing-twitter/#comment-51813</guid>
		<description>I believe that whether twitter monetizes the site efficiently itself thru ads or they ad a 'pro' model, many individuals with large followings will monetize. Obama obviously is helping to monetize by gaining donations and a following of voters.  DVDQuotes is also a good one with a sizable following that is monetizing its profile in a creative way. Interesting to see the organic growth in this new form of commercialism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that whether twitter monetizes the site efficiently itself thru ads or they ad a &#8216;pro&#8217; model, many individuals with large followings will monetize. Obama obviously is helping to monetize by gaining donations and a following of voters.  DVDQuotes is also a good one with a sizable following that is monetizing its profile in a creative way. Interesting to see the organic growth in this new form of commercialism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nils Geylen</title>
		<link>http://usabilityworks.org/2008/01/15/monetizing-twitter/#comment-51352</link>
		<dc:creator>Nils Geylen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilityworks.org/2008/01/15/monetizing-twitter/#comment-51352</guid>
		<description>I titled my post: "Where do I pay for Twitter?" because indeed, Twitter is a service I'd pay for.

Many of your reasons are similar to mine, but search and stability are highest on the list. At this time, our data is just floating there, often not even accessible to ourselves due to the large periods of downtime.

Twitter may well be the most successful shitty app ever.

No ads is good too, and I agree that the pro route is the one to take. We may be getting a lot more spam soon when twitter hits the one million user mark (expected some time this spring) and a network of serious pro users may bypass that.

T-shirts I'd definitely get, esp. the one that would say: "I was there when the Stevenote killed Twitter". Historic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I titled my post: &#8220;Where do I pay for Twitter?&#8221; because indeed, Twitter is a service I&#8217;d pay for.</p>
<p>Many of your reasons are similar to mine, but search and stability are highest on the list. At this time, our data is just floating there, often not even accessible to ourselves due to the large periods of downtime.</p>
<p>Twitter may well be the most successful shitty app ever.</p>
<p>No ads is good too, and I agree that the pro route is the one to take. We may be getting a lot more spam soon when twitter hits the one million user mark (expected some time this spring) and a network of serious pro users may bypass that.</p>
<p>T-shirts I&#8217;d definitely get, esp. the one that would say: &#8220;I was there when the Stevenote killed Twitter&#8221;. Historic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
